Display:


Pathetic (none / 0)

You're using GOP attacks against Obama on the Hamas thing as evidence that Clinton should be the nominee?

This poll is BS on both fronts. Every other poll out of Oregon shows Obama with a 14 point lead. And no way Obama's numbers in KY stay at WV levels.


by elrod on Fri May 16, 2008 at 11:28:42 AM EST

Re: Pathetic (none / 0)

And no way Obama's numbers in KY stay at WV levels.

Kentucky is even more redneck than West Virginia. I think the KY results will be similar to those in WV.


by kingsbridge77 on Fri May 16, 2008 at 11:34:14 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Pathetic (none / 0)

Your wishful thinking won't make it so.


should we go outside? / should we break some bread? / are you'nterested?
by Firewall on Fri May 16, 2008 at 11:39:59 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Pathetic (none / 0)

It's not wishful thinking. It's reasonable hypothesis supported by results from similar states, polling data, and the demographic makeup of Kentucyk.


by Mayor McCheese on Fri May 16, 2008 at 11:43:47 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Pathetic (none / 0)

Kentucky isn't West Virginia. The university count's much higher, and WV actually makes KY look somewhat diversified. As someone currently living in KY (and a few blocks away from an Obama outpost), I can quite assuredly state he'll do better in KY than he did in WV.


should we go outside? / should we break some bread? / are you'nterested?
by Firewall on Fri May 16, 2008 at 11:45:55 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Pathetic (none / 0)

I didn't say it was, but the demographis are SIMILAR. I never said identical. Obama might do a little bit, but probably not much. But we shall see.


by Mayor McCheese on Fri May 16, 2008 at 11:47:09 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Pathetic (none / 0)

The results will be similar in that she'll win, but he's easily going to break 30, if not 40.


should we go outside? / should we break some bread? / are you'nterested?
by Firewall on Fri May 16, 2008 at 11:49:58 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Pathetic (none / 0)

Seems like  a stretch to me. (40) Thirty possibly, maybe even likely.


by Mayor McCheese on Fri May 16, 2008 at 11:51:14 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Demographics say (none / 0)

Kentucky is richer than West Virginia
Kentucky is more educated than West Virginia
Kentucky is less white than West Virginia
Kentucky is younger than West Virginia

Granted, it's just a comparison -- on the whole, it's still good Clinton margins, but via which exact demographic measure is Kentucky more favorable to her than West Virginia was?

If I had to guess, 30 points seems like a reasonable spread, and it's more in line with the other pollsters:
Clinton +32 (SUSA 5/9-11)
Clinton +27 (R2k 5/7-9)
Clinton +25 (Ras 5/5, 13% undecided)

But, hey, my guess is based on the preponderance of all polling data and the actual demographics breakdown, rather than one ARG poll and wishful thinking.  I could be way off.


by Rorgg on Fri May 16, 2008 at 11:53:52 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Pathetic (2.00 / 2)

What diary are you reading? Diarist never said Clinton should be nominee, simply they should team up.

As for Kentucky, the polls have been pretty consistent:

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/ 2008/president/ky/kentucky_democratic_pr imary-638.html


"If we can't live together... we're going to die alone."
by VAAlex on Fri May 16, 2008 at 11:36:10 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Pathetic (2.00 / 1)

The diarist doesn't say this. He says they need to team up. And he's noting correctly that they are attacking Obama on foreign policy, as they would CLinton if she were the favorite to be nominated.


by Mayor McCheese on Fri May 16, 2008 at 11:41:02 AM EST
[ Parent ]