Is the real question: WHY ARE THEY TRYING TO FORCE HILLARY CLINTON OUT OF THE RACE?
While everyone is pointing the finger at Hillary Clinton's remarks about Robert F. Kennedy, no one is focusing on the essence of her comments which led to the remark.
The interviewer is asking her why so many are trying to push her out of the race:
When Obama made the following statement (back in March):
"For those of you who are just weary of the primary, and feeling kind of ground down or that it's like a Bataan death march."
Was he insinuating that Hillary Clinton should be executed?
No surprise that Obama has proclaimed himself the winner through disenfranchisement of millions of voters - he's done it before.
http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/local /chi-070403obama-ballot,1,57567.story
As the Chicago Tribune reported on April 3, Obama knows his way around a ballot and disenfranchising voters seems to be a pattern of his in an effort to win.
Someone sent me this link from Feb, 2008:
http://blogs.abcnews.com/politicalradar/ 2008/02/obama-clinton-s.html
Back in Feb, Obama paid $694,000 to SD's campaigns vs. Hillary's payments to SD'S campaigns of $195,000.
After reading the pdf provided in this link by portia9 in another diary:
http://s3.amazonaws.com/apache.3cdn.net/ de68e7b6dfa0743217_hwm6bhyc4.pdf
Michigan and Florida vote early, are penalized to the point that their votes don't count, yet they have record turnouts.
48 other states count plus Puerto Rico, Democrats Abroad, Guam, Virgin Islands, and other places that don't actually get to vote in a Presidential election. Yet, they count MORE than 2 ACTUAL U.S. states.
Tonight Nebraska held a primary and the results were quite different than the caucus.
Around 39,000 people participated in the NE caucus. Tonight in a primary that DID NOT COUNT more than 89,000 democrats voted, 50,000 more than what participated in the caucus and this did NOT count.
You'll see similar results in the WA caucus vs primary.
The pundits talk about Door #1, Door #2 or Door #3.
"How will Hillary get out gracefully?"
"Will Hillary be the Vice President?"
"What will Hillary do after she leaves the race?"
"Since Hillary can't win, when will she leave?"
"Obama is the Winner*, how come Hillary doesn't know this?"
Here's my take on how I believe this will play out.
The path to the Democratic Nomination for Hillary Clinton remains narrow, though not impossible.
Fundamentally, nothing has changed since Indiana and North Carolina, yet everything has changed. Neither candidate has enough delegates, pledged or otherwise to clinch the nomination and until such time, there is no winner and the race goes on.
The media, which has been biased throughout the entire process, has declared Barack Obama the winner and Hillary Clinton the loser.
They are anxious to crown the new Prince, the one they have chosen. They speak as if he already is the nominee.
They are anxious to see the woman fail, the one they have been chastising all along. They speak as if she has already exited the race.
· NV-2: Exclusive Q&A with Jill Derby on Iraq, FISA, Net Neutrality and more (Sven at My Silver State)
· NC-Sen: Hagan and Dole Tied in New Poll (HellofaSandwich)
· MN-03: Blog Day for Ashwin Madia (MN Campaign Report)
· Blogger Running for CA Dem Party Vice-Chair (Bob Brigham)
· Does McCain Want to Reenact the Draft? (fbihop)
· SD: New Poll Shows Tim Johnson Romping (lowkell)
· Iowa commission takes one small step against CAFOs (desmoinesdem)
· LA-06: Cazayoux's Gittin' It Done! (DailyKingFish)
· Secrets of the American Future Fund (chase martyn)
· Happy Birthday Jerome! (Jonathan Singer)
· Oilmen For Scott Garrett (NJ-5) (Aaron Banks)
· Youth Delegates at DNC Outnumber RNC 15 - 1 (Mike Connery)